4.8 Article

Enhanced Reactivity and Electron Selectivity of Sulfidated Zerovalent Iron toward Chromate under Aerobic Conditions

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 52, 期 5, 页码 2988-2997

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b06502

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51708416, 21777117, 21522704, 51478329]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse Foundation [PCRRK16001]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M620168]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

When zerovalent iron (ZVI) is used in reductive removal of contaminants from industrial wastewater, where dissolved oxygen (DO) competes with target contaminant for the electrons donated by ZVI, both the reactivity and the electron selectivity (ES) of ZVI toward target contaminant are critical. Thus, the reactivity and ES of two sulfidated ZVI (S-ZVI) samples, synthesized by ball-milling with elemental sulfur (S-ZVI(bm)) and reacting with Na2S (S-ZVI(Na2s)), toward Cr(VI) under aerobic conditions were investigated. Sulfidation appreciably increased the reactivity of ZVI and the ratio of the rate constants for Cr(VI) removal by S-ZVIbm or S-ZVI(Na2S) to their counterparts without sulfur fell in the range of 1.4-29.9. ES of S-ZVI(bm) and S-ZVI(Na2s) toward Cr(VI) were determined to be 14.6% and 13.3%, which were 10.7- and 7.5-fold greater than that without sulfidation, respectively. This was mainly ascribed to the greater improving effect of sulfidation on the reduction rate of Cr(VI) than that of DO by ZVI. The improving effects of sulfidation on the performance of ZVI were mainly due to the following mechanisms: sulfidation increased the specific surface area of ZVI, the FeSx layer facilitated the enrichment of Cr(VI) anions on S-ZVI surface because of its anions selective property and favored the electron transfer from Fe core to Cr(VI) at the surface because of its role as efficient electron conductor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据