4.8 Article

Quantification of Mercury Bioavailability for Methylation Using Diffusive Gradient in Thin-Film Samplers

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 52, 期 15, 页码 8521-8529

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b00647

关键词

-

资金

  1. DuPont
  2. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Superfund Research Program [R01ES24344]
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [R01ES024344] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mercury-contaminated sediment and water contain various Hg species, with a small fraction available for microbial conversion to the bioaccumulative neurotoxin monomethylmercury (MeHg). Quantification of this available Hg pool is needed to prioritize sites for risk management. This study compared the efficacy of diffusive gradient in thin-film (DGT) passive samplers to a thiol-based selective extraction method with glutathione (GSH) and conventional filtration (<0.2 mu m) as indicators of Hg bioavailability. Anaerobic sediment slurry microcosms were amended with isotopically labeled inorganic Hg endmembers (dissolved Hg2+, Hg-humic acid, Hg-sorbed to FeS, HgS nanoparticles) with a known range of bioavailability and Hg uptake on DGT methylation potentials. Net MeHg production (expressed as percent of total Hg as MeHg) over 1 week correlated with mass accumulation of Hg endmembers on the DGTs and only sometimes correlated with the 0.2 mu m filter passing Hg fraction and the GSH-extractable Hg fraction. These results suggest for the first time that inorganic Hg uptake in DGTs may indicate bioavailability for methylating microbes. Moreover, the methylating microbial community assessed by hgcA gene abundance was not always consistent with methylation rates between the experiments, indicating that knowledge of the methylating community should target the transcript or protein level. Altogether, these results suggest that DGTs could be used to quantify the bioavailable Hg fraction as part of a method to assess net MeHg production potential in the environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据