4.8 Article

Choose Your Poison-Space-Use Strategy Influences Pollutant Exposure in Barents Sea Polar Bears

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 52, 期 5, 页码 3211-3221

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b06137

关键词

-

资金

  1. Norwegian Polar Institute
  2. Ministry of Climate and Environment
  3. Norwegian Environment Agency
  4. Research Council of Norway [216568, 175989]
  5. Centre for Ice, Climate and Ecosystems (ICE) at the Norwegian Polar Institute
  6. World Wildlife Fund
  7. Norwegian Fulbright Distinguished U.S. Arctic Chairship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Variation in space-use is common within mammal populations. In polar bears, Ursus maritimus, some individuals follow the sea ice (offshore bears) whereas others remain nearshore yearlong (coastal bears). We studied pollutant exposure in relation to space use patterns (offshore vs coastal) in adult female polar bears from the Barents Sea equipped with satellite collars (2000-2014, n = 152). First, we examined the differences in home range (HR) size and position, body condition, and diet proxies (nitrogen and carbon stable isotopes, n = 116) between offshore and coastal space-use. Second, we investigated how FIR, space-use, body condition, and diet were related to plasma concentrations of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), organ-ochlorine pesticides (OCPs) (n = 113), perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs; n = 92), and hydroxylated-PCBs (n = 109). Offshore females were in better condition and had a more specialized diet than did coastal females. PCBs, OCPs, and hydroxylated-PCB concentrations were not related to space-use strategy, yet PCB concentrations increased with increasing latitude, and hydroxylated-PCB concentrations were positively related to HR size. PFAS concentrations were 30-35% higher in offshore bears compared to coastal bears and also increased eastward. On the basis of the results we conclude that space-use of Barents Sea female polar bears influences their pollutant exposure, in particular plasma concentrations of PFAS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据