4.8 Article

Water-Soluble Organic Composition of the Arctic Sea Surface Microlayer and Association with Ice Nucleation Ability

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 52, 期 4, 页码 1817-1826

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b04072

关键词

-

资金

  1. NERC ACCACIA (Aerosol Cloud Coupling And Climate Interactions in the Arctic) project [NE/I028769/1]
  2. Yorkshire Forward
  3. Northern Way Initiative
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/K004980/1, NE/I028769/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. NERC [NE/I028769/1, NE/K004980/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organic matter in the sea surface microlayer (SML) may be transferred to the atmosphere as sea spray and hence influence the composition and properties of marine aerosol. Recent work has demonstrated that the SML contains material capable of heterogeneously nucleating ice, but the nature of this material remains largely unknown. Water-soluble organic matter was extracted from SML and underlying seawater from the Arctic and analyzed using a combination of mass spectrometric approaches. High performance liquid chromatography-ion trap mass spectrometry (LC-IT-MS), and Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance MS (FT-ICR-MS), showed seawater extracts to be compositionally similar across all stations, whereas microlayer extracts had a different and more variable composition. LC-IT-MS demonstrated the enrichment of particular ions in the microlayer. Ice nucleation ability (defined as the median droplet freezing temperature) appeared to be related to the relative abundances of some ions, although the extracts themselves did not retain this property. Molecular formulas were assigned using LC-quadrupole time-of-flight MS (LC-TOF-MS2) and FT-ICR-MS. The ice nucleation tracer ions were associated with elevated biogenic trace gases, and were also observed in atmospheric aerosol collected during the summer, but not early spring suggesting a biogenic source of ice nuclei in the Arctic microlayer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据