4.7 Article

Expert assessments on the future of direct current in buildings

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaca42

关键词

direct current; expert elicitation; non-technical barriers; microgrid; codes; standards

资金

  1. Phillips and Huang Family Fellowship in Energy
  2. Carnegie Mellon University
  3. National Science Foundation [SES-1463492]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing adoption of distributed generation, improving power electronics, and growing electronic loads in buildings have led researchers to propose increased use of direct current (DC) power distribution systems in buildings. As these systems have proven safe and reliable in other applications, they are now being considered for more widespread use in commercial and residential buildings. But nontechnical obstacles remain that have not been addressed in the technical engineering and economic analyses conducted thus far. In this paper, we report on an expert elicitation of 17 experts from industry, research organizations, and the implementation or operation of DC systems to better understand the biggest nontechnical challenges to deploying these systems more broadly. Because these challenges vary based on location, the focus of this study is on the United States of America. Results show that the two biggest barriers are industry professionals unfamiliar with DC and small markets for DC devices and components. To address these, experts proposed developing training programs for engineers and electricians, and developing pilot projects to prove the benefits of DC in niche applications where DC power distribution holds a clear advantage over AC Experts also identified lasting and inherent benefits of DC that make these systems better suited to serve future building loads. These include their ability to interface with distributed generation and onsite DC generation sources such as solar photovoltaics, as well as their ability to communicate and supply power over a single distribution line. Finally, experts identified research priorities to make a better case for what appears to be a promising technological solution to safely and reliably powering future buildings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据