4.7 Article

The impact of aerosol emissions on the 1.5 degrees C pathways

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aab1b2

关键词

anthropogenic aerosol emissions; 1.5 degrees C pathways; climate change

资金

  1. Academy of Finland Center of Excellence program [307331]
  2. Fonds de Recherche du Quebec-Nature et technologies [200414]
  3. Concordia Institute for Water, Energy and Sustainable Systems (CIWESS)
  4. Academy of Finland [308365]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To assess the impact of anthropogenic aerosol emission reduction on limiting global temperature increase to 1.5 degrees C or 2 degrees C above pre-industrial levels, two climate modeling approaches have been used (MAGICC6, and a combination of ECHAM-HAMMOZ and the UVic ESCM), with two aerosol control pathways under two greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction scenarios. We found that aerosol emission reductions associated with CO2 co-emissions had a significant warming effect during the first half of the century and that the near-term warming is dependent on the pace of aerosol emission reduction. The modeling results show that these aerosol emission reductions account for about 0.5 degrees C warming relative to 2015, on top of the 1 degrees C above pre-industrial levels that were already reached in 2015. We found also that the decreases in aerosol emissions lead to different decreases in the magnitude of the aerosol radiative forcing in the two models. By 2100, the aerosol forcing is projected by ECHAM-UVic to diminish in magnitude by 0.96 W m(-2) and by MAGICC6 by 0.76 W m(-2) relative to 2000. Despite this discrepancy, the climate responses in terms of temperature are similar. Aggressive aerosol control due to air quality legislation affects the peak temperature, which is 0.2 degrees C-0.3 degrees C above the 1.5 degrees C limit even within the most ambitious CO2/GHG reduction scenario. At the end of the century, the temperature differences between aerosol reduction scenarios in the context of ambitious CO2 mitigation are negligible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据