4.7 Article

Biodegradation of microcystin-LR using acclimatized bacteria isolated from different units of the drinking water treatment plant

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 242, 期 -, 页码 407-416

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.008

关键词

Acclimatized bacteria; Microcystin; Degradation pathway; Drinking water; Toxicity

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research [23451]
  2. Genome Quebec
  3. Genome Canada
  4. ATRAPP (Algal blooms, treatment, risk assessment, prediction, and prevention) [61165482015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacterial community isolated from different units of a Drinking Water Treatment Plant (DWTP) including pre-ozonation unit (POU), the effluent-sludge mixture of the sedimentation unit (ESSU) and top-sand layer water sample from the filtration unit (TSFU) were acclimatized separately in the microcystinleucine arginine (MC-LR)-rich environment to evaluate MC-LR biodegradation. Maximum biodegradation efficiency of 97.2 +/- 8.7% was achieved by the acclimatized-TSFU bacterial community followed by 72.1 +/- 6.4% and 86.2 +/- 7.3% by acclimatized-POU and acclimatized-ESSU bacterial community, respectively. Likewise, the non-acclimatized bacterial community showed similar biodegradation efficiency of 71.1 +/- 7.37%, 86.7 +/- 3.19% and 94.35 +/- 10.63% for TSFU, ESSU and POU, respectively, when compared to the acclimatized ones. However, the biodegradation rate increased 1.5-folds for acclimatized versus non acclimatized conditions. The mass spectrometry studies on MC-LR degradation depicted hydrolytic linearization of cyclic MC-LR along with the formation of small peptide fragments including Adda molecule that is linked to the reduced toxicity (qualitative toxicity analysis). This was further confirmed quantitatively by using Rhizobium meliloti as a bioindicator. The acclimatized-TSFU bacterial community comprised of novel MC-LR degrading strains, Chryseobacterium sp. and Pseudomonas fragi as confirmed by 16S rRNA sequencing. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据