4.5 Article

Juvenile Atlantic cod behavior appears robust to near-future CO2 levels

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ZOOLOGY
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12983-015-0104-2

关键词

Carbon dioxide; Teleost; Climate change; Boldness; Teleost; Lateralization; Behavior; Gadus morhua; Ocean acidification

类别

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council Formas [Jutfelt 2009-596]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Ocean acidification caused by the anthropogenic release of CO2 is considered a major threat to marine ecosystems. One unexpected impact of elevated water CO2 levels is that behavioral alterations may occur in tropical reef fish and certain temperate fish species. These effects appear to alter many different types of sensory and cognitive functions; if widespread and persistent, they have the potential to cause ecosystem changes. Methods: We investigated whether economically and ecologically important Atlantic cod also display behavioral abnormalities by exposing 52 juvenile cod to control conditions (500 mu atm, duplicate tanks) or an end-of-the-century ocean acidification scenario (1000 mu atm, duplicate tanks) for one month, during which time the fish were examined for a range of behaviors that have been reported to be affected by elevated CO2 in other fish. The behaviors were swimming activity, as measured by number of lines crossed per minute, the emergence from shelter, determined by how long it took the fish to exit a shelter after a disturbance, relative lateralization (a measure of behavioral turning side preference), and absolute lateralization (the strength of behavioral symmetry). Results: We found no effect of CO2 treatment on any of the four behaviors tested: activity (F = 1.61, p = 0.33), emergence from shelter (F = 0.13, p = 0.76), relative lateralization (F = 2.82, p = 0.50), and absolute lateralization (F = 0.80, p = 0.26). Conclusion: Our results indicate that the behavior of Atlantic cod could be resilient to the impacts of near-future levels of water CO2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据