4.7 Article

Disruption of the gonadal endocannabinoid system in zebrafish exposed to diisononyl phthalate

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 241, 期 -, 页码 1-8

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.007

关键词

DiNP; Endocannabinoids; Gonads; Zebrafish

资金

  1. Progetti di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale (PRIN) [prot 2010W87LBJ]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [RT69-0017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DiNP (Di-isononyl phthalate) has been recently introduced as DEHP (Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate) substitute and due to its chemical properties, DiNP is commonly used in a large variety of plastic items. The endocannabinoid system (ECS) is a lipid signaling system involved in a plethora of physiological pathways including the control of the reproductive and metabolic processes. In this study, the effects of DiNP on the ECS of zebrafish (male and female) gonads were analyzed. Adult zebrafish were chronically exposed for 21 days via water to 3 environmentally relevant concentrations of DiNP (42 mu g/L; 4.2 mu g/L; 0.42 mu g/L). In females, the Gonadosomatic Index (GSI) and the number of fertilized eggs were reduced by the lowest concentration of DiNP tested. The levels of two endocannabinoids, Anandamide (AEA) and 2-Arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), were not affected, while a reduction of the N-oleoyl-ethanolamine (OEA) level was observed. Transcriptional changes were reported in relation to genes coding for the ECS receptors and the enzymes involved in the ECS pathway. DiNP exposure in males reduced the GSI as well as changed the levels of endocannabinoids. Moreover, DiNP treatment induced significative changes in the genes coding for the ECS receptors and enzymes, and significantly increased the activity of the fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH). In summary, in zebrafish, exposure to environmentally relevant concentrations of DiNP disrupted the ECS and affected reproduction in a gender specific manner. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据