4.7 Article

Generation of hydroxyl radicals and singlet oxygen by particulate matter and its inorganic components

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 238, 期 -, 页码 638-646

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.03.068

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Center in Poland [2015/16/W/ST5/00005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Particulate matter (PM) can strongly affect redox biochemistry and therefore induce the response of the immune system and aggravate the course of autoimmune diseases. Nanoparticles containing transition metal compounds possessing semiconductor properties (TiO2, ZnO) may act as photocatalysts and accelerate the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS). In this study, the NIST standard reference material, SRM 1648a, has been analyzed in terms of this consideration. Organic compounds present in SRM 1648a were removed by cold oxygen plasma treatment. Samples of SRM 1648a with removed organic content (<2% of organic carbon, <1% of nitrogen) were obtained within 2 h of this treatment. The treatment did not affect the morphology of the powder. The reference material and PM2.5 collected in Krakow are composed of smaller particles and nanoparticles forming aggregates. The efficiency of (photo)generation of hydroxyl radicals and singlet oxygen was compared for original and organics-free samples. The analyzed samples showed the highest activity towards ROS generation when exposed to UV-vis-NIR light, moderate under UV irradiation, and the lowest in dark. Data collected in the present study suggest that the organic fraction is mostly responsible for singlet oxygen generation, as almost twice higher efficiency of O-1(2) generation was observed for the original NIST sample compared to the material without the organic fraction. However, particulate matter collected in Krakow was found to have a five times higher activity in singlet oxygen generation (compared for original NIST and Krakow dust samples). (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据