4.7 Article

Ammonia emissions from paddy fields are underestimated in China

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 235, 期 -, 页码 482-488

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.12.103

关键词

Nitrogen rate; Ammonia loss proportion; Non-linear response; Air pollution; Climate factor

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFD0800500, 2016YFC0207906]
  2. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest from the Ministry of Agriculture, China [201303089]
  3. Newton Fund [BB/N013484/1]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41773068, 41671464]
  5. BBSRC [BB/N013484/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/N013484/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Excessive nitrogen (N) fertilizers are often used in China, and a large proportion of the N can be lost as ammonia (NH3). However, quantifying the NH3 emission from paddy fields is always affected by large uncertainties due to different measuring methods and other factors such as climate. In this study, using a standardized method, we measured the NH3 emissions in three typical annual rice cropping systems: single rice, double rice and rotation with other crops. The measurements were conducted for 2 years with a total of 3131 observations across China. Results showed that NH3 emissions accounted for 17.7% (14.4 -21.0%) of the N applied under current farm practice, which was 33.1% (10.6-52.6%) higher than previous estimates. Nitrogen application rate was the dominant factor influencing NH3 emission rate, which exponentially increased with the N fertilizer rate (p < .001). Total NH3 emissions from paddy fields were estimated at 1.7 Tg N yr(-1) in 2013 in China, several times the amount of N lost through leaching or runoff. This suggests that mitigation measures for non-point source pollution from cropland should take into account not only the N lost to water, but also to air, thereby improving air quality. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据