4.7 Article

The phytotoxicities of decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209) to different rice cultivars (Oryza sativa L.)

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 235, 期 -, 页码 692-699

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.12.079

关键词

Phytotoxicity; Decabromodiphenyl ether; Antioxidant-related metabolites; Rice cultivars

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21520102009, 21621005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209), as a major component of brominated flame retardants, has been detected in the agricultural soil in considerable amount. Given that BDE-209 is toxic, ubiquitous and persistent, BDE-209 might induce toxic effects on rice cultivars planted in contaminated soil. A comparative study was conducted on phytotoxicities and GC-MS based antioxidant-related metabolite levels to investigate the differences of phytotoxicities of BDE-209 to rice cultivars in Yangtze River Delta of China. Rice seedlings were treated with BDE-209 at 0, 10, 50, 100 and 500 mu g/L in a hydroponic setup. Results showed that BDE-209-induced phytotoxicites were cultivar-dependent and that the antioxidant defense systems in the cultivars were disturbed differently. Among the three selected cultivars (Jiayou 5, Lianjing 7 and Yongyou 9), Jiayou 5 and Lianjing 7 displayed lower toxic effects than Yongyou 9 in terms of the growth inhibition, lipid peroxidation and DNA damage. The increases of antioxidant enzymes were significantly higher in Jiayou 5 and Lianjing 7 than those in Yongyou 9. Multivariate analysis of antioxidant-related metabolites in the three cultivars indicated that L-tryptophan and L-valine were the most important ones among 10 metabolites responsible for the separation of cultivars. The up-regulation of L-tryptophan and L-valine were likely plant strategies to increase their tolerance. The current results provided an insight into the development of rice cultivars with higher BDE-209 tolerance. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据