4.7 Article

Nationwide ground-level ozone measurements in China suggest serious risks to forests

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 237, 期 -, 页码 803-813

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.11.002

关键词

Surface ozone; Ozone-exposure metrics; Risk assessment; Forests; China

资金

  1. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS [QYZDB-SSW-DQC019]
  2. Hundred Talents Program, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences President's International Fellowship Initiative (PIFI) for Senior Scientists [2016VBA057]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31500396]
  5. CNR-CAS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We processed hourly ozone (O-3) concentrations collected in 2015 and in 2016 by a network of 1497 stations across China, with the main aim of assessing the risk that present ambient O-3 exposure is posing to Chinese forests. Our results indicate that the values of the metrics AOT40 (the accumulated hourly O-3 concentrations above 40 ppb during daylight hours) recommended as European Union standard, and W126 (the sum of weighted hourly concentrations from 8:00 to 20:00) recommended as USA standard for forest protection, exceeded the critical levels (5 ppm h across 6 months for AOT40 and 7-21 ppm h over 3 months for W126) on average by 5.1 and 1.2 times, respectively. N100 showed on average 65 annual exceedances of 100 ppb as hourly value. The 12-h and 24-h averages showed a small difference, suggesting high concentrations also at night. Risk was higher for the northern temperate climate than for the southern tropical and sub-tropical climates, and overall for the northern regions than for the southern regions. Higher risk occurred in the non-urban areas than in the urban areas in northern, southwest and north-west China, whereas risk was higher at urban areas in eastern and southern China. The overall results of this first nationwide assessment suggest a significant risk for forests over the entire China and warrant for urgent measures for controlling O-3 precursor emissions and establishing standards of protection. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据