4.7 Article

Assessment of particulate matter and ammonia emission concentrations and respective plume profiles from a commercial poultry house

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 238, 期 -, 页码 10-16

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.039

关键词

-

资金

  1. USDA-NRCS Conservation Innovation Grant Program [69-3A75-12-244]
  2. University of Maryland
  3. Oklahoma State University
  4. Pennsylvania State University
  5. USDAARS
  6. USDA-ARS intramural National Program [212]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poultry-emitted air pollutants, including particulate matter (PM) and ammonia, have raised concerns due to potential negative effects on human health and the environment. However, developing and optimizing remediation technologies requires a better understanding of air pollutant concentrations, the emission plumes, and the relationships between the pollutants. Therefore, we conducted ten field experiments to characterize PM (total suspended particulate [ISM, particulate matter less than 10 mu m in aerodynamic diameter [PM10], and particulate matter less than 2.5 mu m in aerodynamic diameter [PM2.5] and ammonia emission-concentration profiles from a typical commercial poultry house. The emission factors of the poultry house, which were calculated using the concentrations and fan speed, were 0.66 (0.29-0.99) g NH3-N bird(-1)d(-1) for ammonia, 52 (44-168) g d(-1)AU(-1) (AU = animal unit = 500 kg) for TSP, 3.48 (1.16-9.03) g d(-1)AU(-1) for PM10, and 0.07 (0.00-0.36) g d(-1)AU(-1) for PM2.5. PM and ammonia emission concentrations decreased as distance from the fan increased. Although emission concentrations were similar in the daytime and nighttime, diurnal and nocturnal plume shapes were different due to the increased stability of the atmosphere at night. Particle size distribution analysis revealed that, at a given height, the percentage of PM10 and PM2.5 was consistent throughout the plume, indicating that the larger particles were not settling out of the airstream faster than the smaller particles. Overall, the direction of the measured air pollutant emission plumes was dominated by the tunnel fan ventilation airflow rate and direction instead of the ambient wind speed and direction. This is important because currently available air dispersion models use ambient or modeled wind speed and direction as input parameters. Thus, results will be useful in evaluating dispersion models for ground-level, horizontally-released, point sources and in developing effective pollutant remediation strategies for emissions. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据