4.7 Article

Wildfire susceptibility mapping: Deterministic vs. stochastic approaches

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE
卷 101, 期 -, 页码 194-203

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.12.019

关键词

Susceptibility mapping; Wildfires; Random forest; Extreme learning machines; Portugal

资金

  1. Herbette Foundation of the University of Lausanne [2016-2-E-15]
  2. FIREXTR project [PTDC/ATPGEO/0462/2014]
  3. project Interact - Integrative Research in Environment, Agro-Chain and Technology [NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000017]
  4. FEDER/NORTE
  5. European Investment Funds by FEDER/COMPETE/POCI - Operacional Competitiveness and Internacionalization Programme [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006958]
  6. FCT - Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [UID/AGR/04033/2013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wildfire susceptibility is a measure of land propensity for the occurrence of wildfires based on terrain's intrinsic characteristics. In the present study, two stochastic approaches (i.e., extreme learning machine and random forest) for wildfire susceptibility mapping are compared versus a well established deterministic method. The same predisposing variables were combined and used as predictors in all models. The Portuguese region of Dao-Lafoes was selected as a pilot site since it presents national average values of fire incidence and a high heterogeneity in land cover and slope. Maps representing the susceptibility of the study area to wildfires were finally elaborated. Two measures were used to compare the different methods, namely the location of the pixels with similar standardized susceptibility and total validation burnt area. Results obtained with the stochastic methods are very alike with the deterministic ones, with the advantage of not depending on a priori knowledge of the phenomenon. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据