4.6 Article

Keystone taxa predict compositional change in microbial communities

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 20, 期 6, 页码 2207-2217

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.14257

关键词

-

资金

  1. United States National Science Foundation (NSF) [DGE-1256259]
  2. NSF [NTL-LTER DEB-1440297, DEB-1344254]
  3. National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture [1002996]
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [1440297] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of biotic interactions on microbial community assembly is intensely debated. We hypothesized that keystone taxa, which influence community assembly through strong biotic interactions, are important for regulating microbial community composition. While highly connected microbes have been identified, evidence that these taxa act as keystones is lacking, because keystone status requires influence on whole-community dynamics. We address this gap, showing that small subsets of highly connected keystone taxa (generally 1%-5% of richness) can be optimal predictors of whole-community compositional change. In three long-term data sets, greater connectivity due to the presence of keystone taxa corresponded to lower compositional turnover. We further hypothesized that the influence of keystone taxa would be diminished when environmental disturbance was a strong driver of compositional change. We used two case studies of reference and disturbed communities to investigate how biotic and abiotic forces interact to shape community composition. Most of the same taxa were present in both the reference and disturbed communities, but keystone taxa had much greater explanatory power in the reference communities. Our results suggest that greater biotic connectivity arising from the presence of keystone taxa is stabilizing to community composition, and that keystone taxa can be good indicators of pending community shifts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据