4.6 Article

Contribution of peroxisomal docking machinery to mycotoxin biosynthesis, pathogenicity and pexophagy in the plant pathogenic fungus Fusarium graminearum

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 20, 期 9, 页码 3224-3245

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.14291

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31672064, 31525020, 31701744]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LR17C140001]
  3. International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China [2016YFE0112900]
  4. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0300706]
  5. China Agriculture Research System [CARS-3-1-15]
  6. Young Elite Scientist Sponsorship Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peroxisomal proliferation is highly stimulated during the biosynthesis of mycotoxins and plant infection by Fusarium graminearum. Currently, the functions of the peroxisome in these cellular processes are poorly understood. In this study, we applied genetic, cell biological and biochemical analyses to investigate the functions of the peroxisomes. We constructed targeted deletion of docking machinery components, including FgPex13, FgPex14 and the filamentous fungal specific peroxin FgPex33. Our results indicated that peroxisome dysfunction resulted in a shortage of acetyl-CoA, the precursor of trichothecene biosynthesis, and subsequently decreased deoxynivalenol (DON) production. Deletion mutants of FgPex13, FgPex14 or FgPex33 showed an increased accumulation of endogenous reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reduced phosphorylation of MAP (Mitogen-Activated Protein) kinase FgMgv1. In addition, mutants of the docking peroxin exhibited increased sensitivity toward host oxidative bursts and cell wall integrity stress agents and reduced virulence on host plants. More importantly, we found for the first time that FgPex14 is required for pexophagy in F. graminearum. Overall, our study suggests that peroxisomes play critical roles in DON biosynthesis and virulence in F. graminearum.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据