4.7 Article

Carboxylate clamp tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domain containing Hsp90 cochaperones in Triticeace: An insight into structural and functional diversification

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 155, 期 -, 页码 31-44

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.06.020

关键词

Bread wheat; Cochaperone; Heterologous expression; Stress tolerance; Tetratricopeptide repeat; Triticeace

资金

  1. National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, India
  2. University Grant Commission (UGC), Govt. of India
  3. DST-SERB

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The molecular chaperones serve as surveillance molecules that mediates regulatory crosstalk between protein folding and degradation pathways under natural and stress conditions. In present study, we focused on the diversification and role of tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domain containing Hsp90 cochaperones. These co-chaperone were recognized by the presence of three motifs of TPR with the basic conserved residues often referred to as carboxylate clamp (CC). A total of 213 putative CC-TPRs were found in Triticeace, clustered into 16 groups, amongst which few CC-TPR families such as TPR-RPAP3 and TPR-SMYD were documented. Domain architecture and genomic organization revealed that CC-TPRs are very diverse in nature. Evolutionary analyses showed that CC-TPRs are conserved, stable and ubiquitous in nature. Analysis of available RNA-seq data revealed a high degree of tissue-specific expression of 1-TPR and TaTPR-FKBP family members at various developmental stages. The transcripts of TaCC-TPRs displayed differential expression in two contrasting wheat cultivars under abiotic stress conditions. Complementation and heterologous expression of TaTPR-FKBP5 in yeast conferred abiotic stress tolerance. Together, these results provide a glimpse into the genetic diversity and evolution of CC-TPRs in Triticeace, which would help to better understand of how TPR-domain cochaperones function in plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据