4.7 Article

Experimental study on dynamic compressive properties of fiber-reinforced reactive powder concrete at high strain rates

期刊

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
卷 169, 期 -, 页码 119-130

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.036

关键词

Reactive powder concrete; Split Hopkinson pressure bar; Energy absorption; Dynamic stress-strain responses; Dynamic increase factor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51578184, 51408167]
  2. postdoctoral scientific research developmental fund of Heilongjiang Province [LBH-Q15058]
  3. foundation of key lab of structures dynamic behavior and control of the ministry of education, Harbin Institute of Technology [HITCE201605]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dynamic compression tests were performed on reactive powder concrete (RPC) using split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) apparatus. A total of 102 RPC samples including plain RPC (PRPC), steel fiber-reinforced RPC (SFRPC) with 2% and 5% volumetric fractions of steel fiber, and hybrid fiber reinforced RPC (SPFRPC) with 0.2% polypropylene (PP) fiber and 2% steel fiber were characterized at high strain rate of 72-317 s(-1). The characteristics of wave transmission, dynamic compressive strength, compressive deformation, energy absorption ability, and dynamic increase factor (DIF) of RPC under high strain rate impact were systematically investigated. Results revealed that the dynamic compressive strength of PRPC was more sensitive than that of SFRPC. With the addition of 0.2% PP fiber, the dynamic compressive strength of SFRPC exhibited a slight decrease. The critical strain increased with increasing strain rate. In all cases of RPC, the critical damage variable decreased with increasing fiber content subjected to same strain rate impact. The energy absorption of RPC increased with increasing content of steel fiber, which was found to be higher than normal strength concrete and high strength concrete. It was observed that application of CEB formula to calculate DIF of RPC was not safe. Thus, an empirical formula for DIF of RPC was proposed based on test data of this study and existing literature results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据