4.7 Article

Optimal power flow solutions using differential evolution algorithm integrated with effective constraint handling techniques

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2017.10.019

关键词

Optimal power flow; Power loss; Emission; Differential evolution (DE); Constraint handling (CH); Ensemble of constraint handling techniques (ECHT)

资金

  1. National Research Foundation Singapore under its Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Optimal power flow (OPF) is a highly non-linear complex optimization problem where the steady state parameters of an electrical network need to be determined for its economical and efficient operation. The complexity of the problem escalates with ubiquitous presence of constraints in the problem. Solving OPF remains a popular but challenging task among power system researchers. In last couple of decades, numerous evolutionary algorithms (EAs) have been applied to find optimal solutions with different objectives of OPF. However, the search method adopted by EAs is unconstrained. An extensively used methodology to discard infeasible solutions found during the search process is the static penalty function approach. The process requires appropriate selection of penalty coefficients decided largely by tedious trial and error method. This paper presents performance evaluation of proper constraint handling (CH) techniques superiority of feasibly solutions (SF), self-adaptive penalty (SP) and an ensemble of these two constraint handling techniques (ECHT) with differential evolution (DE) being the basic search algorithm, on the problem of OPF. The methods are tested on standard IEEE 30, IEEE 57 and IEEE 118-bus systems for several OPF objectives such as cost, emission, power loss, voltage stability etc. Single objective and weighted sum multi-objective cases of OPF are studied under the scope of this literature. Simulation results are analyzed and compared with most recent studies on the problem.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据