4.5 Article

Comparative analyses of CTCF and BORIS occupancies uncover two distinct classes of CTCF binding genomic regions

期刊

GENOME BIOLOGY
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-015-0736-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health
  2. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
  3. California Institute of Regenerative Medicine [RN2-00905]
  4. US National Institutes of Health [P50 GM085764-03, U01 ES017166]
  5. NIH/NCI [T32 CA009523-27S1]
  6. PRC
  7. Cancer Council NSW [RG11-12, RG14-05, RG14-09]
  8. Tour de Cure
  9. Cure the Future (Cell and Gene Trust)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: CTCF and BORIS (CTCFL), two paralogous mammalian proteins sharing nearly identical DNA binding domains, are thought to function in a mutually exclusive manner in DNA binding and transcriptional regulation. Results: Here we show that these two proteins co-occupy a specific subset of regulatory elements consisting of clustered CTCF binding motifs (termed 2xCTSes). BORIS occupancy at 2xCTSes is largely invariant in BORIS-positive cancer cells, with the genomic pattern recapitulating the germline-specific BORIS binding to chromatin. In contrast to the single-motif CTCF target sites (1xCTSes), the 2xCTS elements are preferentially found at active promoters and enhancers, both in cancer and germ cells. 2xCTSes are also enriched in genomic regions that escape histone to protamine replacement in human and mouse sperm. Depletion of the BORIS gene leads to altered transcription of a large number of genes and the differentiation of K562 cells, while the ectopic expression of this CTCF paralog leads to specific changes in transcription in MCF7 cells. Conclusions: We discover two functionally and structurally different classes of CTCF binding regions, 2xCTSes and 1xCTSes, revealed by their predisposition to bind BORIS. We propose that 2xCTSes play key roles in the transcriptional program of cancer and germ cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据