4.7 Article

How to peak carbon emissions in China's power sector: A regional perspective

期刊

ENERGY POLICY
卷 120, 期 -, 页码 365-381

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.067

关键词

Regional power industry; Carbon emissions peak; Advanced technology; Renewable energy development; National Energy Technology-Power model; China

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFA0602603]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71573013, 71603020, 71521002, 71642004]
  3. Beijing Natural Science Foundation of China [9152014]
  4. Special Items Fund for Cultivation and Development of Beijing Creative Base [Z171100002217023]
  5. Key Project of Beijing Social Science Foundation Research Base [15DJA084]
  6. Special Items Fund of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

China pledged to peak its carbon emissions by 2030. Considering the great contribution of power industry on the energy-related CO2 emissions and its main role for peaking China's CO2 emissions prior to 2030, this study aims to investigate the peaking time of CO2 emissions in China's power industry from a regional perspective. Only each regional power industry tries its best to peak its carbon emissions prior to 2030, will China's power industry achieve its carbon emissions peak by 2030. Consequently, we develop a National Energy Technology-Power (NET-Power) model to assess the impacts of technological improvement and energy structure shift on the carbon emissions for each region, and further answer the question of carbon emissions peak in the power industry. The results show that when taking joint actions of promoting advanced technologies and shifting to more renewable energy, China's power industry could peak its CO2 emissions at 3717.99MtCO(2) in 2023. All regional power industries will achieve the goals of peaking their CO2 emissions by 2030 except East. The detailed development pathways of power-generation technologies for achieving the peak prior to 2030 in each region are drawn.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据