4.7 Article

A multi-model assessment of energy and emissions for India's transportation sector through 2050

期刊

ENERGY POLICY
卷 116, 期 -, 页码 10-18

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.037

关键词

India; Transport; Energy consumption; Emissions; Inter-model comparison

资金

  1. United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
  2. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) [DGG-4-42182-01]
  3. NITI Aayog (National Institution for Transforming India), Government of India
  4. United States Department of Energy by Battelle Memorial Institute [DE-AC05-76RL01830]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper focuses on comparing the framework and projections of energy consumption and emissions from India's transportation sector up to 2050. To understand the role of road transport in energy demand and emissions, five modeling teams developed baseline projections for India's transportation sector as part of inter model comparison exercise under the Sustainable Growth Working Group (SGWG) of the US-India Energy Dialog. Based on modeling results, we explore the developments in India's passenger and freight road transport, including changes in the modal shift and the resulting changes in energy consumption, carbon dioxide (CO2) and particulate matter (PM2.5) emissions. We find significant differences in the base-year data and parameters for future projections, namely energy consumption by transport in general and by mode, service demand for passenger and freight transport. Variation in modeling assumptions across modeling teams reflects the difference in opinion among the different modeling teams which in turn reflects the underlying uncertainty with respect to key assumptions. We have identified several important data gaps in our knowledge about the development of the transportation sector in India. The results of this inter-model study can be used by Indian policy makers to set quantified targets in emission reductions from the transportation sector.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据