4.7 Article

Understanding the effects of energy management practices on renewable energy supply chains: Implications for energy policy in emerging economies

期刊

ENERGY POLICY
卷 118, 期 -, 页码 418-428

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.043

关键词

Energy efficiency; Renewable energy; Sustainable supply chain; Energy audit; Emerging economy

资金

  1. Division of Research & Innovation, Universiti Malaysia Pahang [RDU1703138]
  2. Universiti Sains Malaysia [304/PPAMC/6313108]
  3. Research Technology Transfer, Binus University [OMN-02]
  4. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [304931/2016-0, 404682/2016-2]
  5. Research Support Foundation of the State of Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) [E-26/203.252/2017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drawing from the resource-based view (RBV) and complexity theories, we test the effects of energy management practices on renewable energy supply chain (RESC) initiatives in 151 certified (ISO 14001 and ISO 50001) manufacturing firms in Malaysia. Our results showed three dimensions of energy management practices (EMP) top management commitment, energy awareness, and energy auditing which were positively associated with the development of RESC initiatives. We found that insufficient knowledge of energy efficiency means firms struggle to manage energy effectively, constraining opportunities such as converting waste into energy to support business' targets. Our work has implications for energy policy. For example, we suggest that the transfer of energy efficiency management knowledge and technology from multinational to local companies could help to improve energy usage, and that local companies could generate renewable energy through supply chain networks. The findings of this work shed light on how to further develop energy efficiency policy in emerging economies, with implications for academics, practitioners and decision-makers. This work makes the case for an integrated discussion of energy management and renewable energy supply chains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据