4.7 Article

Preliminary conceptual design and thermodynamic comparative study on vapor absorption refrigeration cycles integrated with a supercritical CO2 power cycle

期刊

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
卷 161, 期 -, 页码 162-171

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.01.065

关键词

Combined cooling and power system; Supercritical CO2 cycle; Absorption refrigeration cycle; Parametric analysis; Intelligence algorithm optimization

资金

  1. state key special research project of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFB0600104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Combined cooling and power system has gained extensive attention from government and publics throughout the world due to fuel saving, high energy utilization efficiency and different energy forms output. In this paper, a novel combined cooling and power system comprising a supercritical CO2 (sCO(2)) power cycle and a vapor absorption refrigeration cycle with lithium bromide as the working fluid is proposed. A comparative study is conducted between this system and the combined sCO(2)/ammonia-water system to show its advantages and potential on the basis of the self-built thermodynamic simulation platform. The influence of different variables including turbine inlet temperature, pressure ratio in sCO(2) cycle and evaporating temperature on the system performance is analyzed. Single-objective optimization relying on the genetic algorithm and multi-objective optimization based on the NSGA-II method are used to further investigate and compare the performance of above two cycles. Optimization results reveal that compared with the combined sCO(2)/ammonia-water system, the proposed sCO(2)/LiBr-H2O system could gain improvement on CORP by 0.3112 at the expensive of COPP drop by 0.0004 excepting the advantage of extreme low pump outlet pressure in bottoming cycle. Besides, sCO(2)/LiBr-H2O system is relatively easier to reach the balance between power and cooling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据