4.7 Article

Thermodynamic analysis and multi-objective optimization of a novel power/cooling cogeneration system for low-grade heat sources

期刊

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
卷 166, 期 -, 页码 64-73

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.04.028

关键词

Ammonia-water mixture; Power; Cogeneration system; Absorber-ejector refrigeration; Cycle coupling; Multi-objective optimization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51541604]
  2. Key Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China [61733010]
  3. Major International (Regional) Joint Research Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [61320106011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel power/cooling cogeneration system based on an ammonia-water power cycle is proposed and investigated. The cooling capacity of the conventional combined system is much improved since an absorption-ejector refrigeration cycle is introduced. Besides the novel combined system could get more high-grade work at the same time obtain amounts of refrigeration due to the unique coupling mode. A mathematical model of the novel system is developed for system simulations under steady-state conditions. The results show that the thermal efficiency and the energy efficiency are 21.34% and 38.95%, respectively. Energy analysis shows that the energy destruction mainly occurs in the recovery heat exchanger, followed by boiler and rectifier, respectively. Parametric study shows that the absorber temperature, the cycle high pressure, the temperature at boiler outlet and the extracting ratio have significant effects on the system performance. In addition, a multi-objective optimization using NSGA-II method is carried out to obtain the final optimums of the proposed system. The optimization results show that the energy efficiency and the overall capital cost rate are 37.24% and 0.69408 $/ h, respectively, and the thermal efficiency versus the overall capital cost rate are found to be 20.99% and 0.73351 $/h.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据