4.7 Article

Wood waste as an alternative thermal insulation for buildings

期刊

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
卷 168, 期 -, 页码 374-384

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.03.019

关键词

Wood waste; Thermal insulation; Natural building materials; Hygrothermal

资金

  1. Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)
  2. TUBITAK

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Current insulation materials in the construction market, which are predominantly inorganic materials, have a high performance in relation to heat transfer, i.e. high R-values, but the environmental impacts in their production processes are significant. The use of bio-based natural fibre materials such as cork, cotton, wood fibre, hemp, etc. with their lower embodied energy, moisture buffering capacity and, consequently, improved Indoor Environmental Quality have received increasing focus in both research and application, particularly amongst environmentally-conscious clients and designers. In this study a natural fibre material in the form of wood waste is examined experimentally to assess its suitability for use as a thermal insulation material, without the addition of any binder, within a timber frame wall construction. The wood waste is from primary production sources using untreated material. According to our experimental results, the thermal conductivity values of wood waste with different densities, ranged from 0.048 to 0.055 W/mK. These values are slightly higher than commonly used inorganic based insulation materials, although comparable to other natural insulation materials in the market, but have the economic advantage of being a low-cost by-product. The values relating to the material hygric performance including the water vapour diffusion resistance factor, water vapour permeability, and water absorption coefficient were also determined and presented, which will help facilitate future hygrothermal modelling. Crown Copyright (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据