4.7 Article

Study of Sewage Sludge/Coal Co-Combustion by Thermogravimetric Analysis and Single Particle Co-Combustion Method

期刊

ENERGY & FUELS
卷 32, 期 5, 页码 6300-6308

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b00511

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51506091, 51576100]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFB0600100]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [30915011325]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a single particle (400-500 mu m) co-combustion method wa s proposed to study the co-combustion characteristics of sewage sludge (SS) and bituminous coal (BC) in air and oxy-fuel conditions. In addition, the thermogravimetric analysis experiments were also carried out for comparison. The results from single particle combustion experiments indicate that SS and BC and their blends all exhibit a two-stage combustion process. With the blending ratio of SS increasing from 0-50 wt %, the volatiles flame of blended fuel particle becomes shorter and smaller, while the average temperature of volatiles flame increases from 1332.4 to 1399.2 degrees C, which suggests a synergistic effect exists. Owing to the extremely low fixed carbon content of SS, the average temperature of char combustion of the blended fuel particles decreases from 1472.3 to 1281.3 degrees C. The ignition delay time and volatiles burnout time of the blended fuel particles obviously decrease with the addition of SS. Replacing N-2 by CO2 extends the ignition delay time and volatiles burnout time, and decreases the brightness, size, and average temperature of volatiles flame (by more than 140 degrees C), while its influence on the temperature of char combustion is less obvious. Increasing the O-2 mole fraction in CO2 from 21% to 40% shortens the ignition delay time and volatiles burnout time, while it increases the combustion temperatures of volatiles (from 1258.7 to 1501.0 degrees C) and chars (from 1245.1 to 1545.9 degrees C).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据