4.8 Article

Boosting the thermoelectric performance of PbSe through dynamic doping and hierarchical phonon scattering

期刊

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 1848-1858

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ee00418h

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51371194, 51772186, 51572167, 51632005, 11674211]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0701600]
  3. 111 Project [D16002]
  4. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [16DZ2260601]
  5. Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning [TP2015041]
  6. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [16ZR1448000]
  7. Program of Shanghai Subject Chief Scientist [16XD1401100]
  8. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0001299]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Here we find the peculiar behavior of Cu ions in the PbSe-Cu system increases its thermoelectric performance. For the electrical transport, a dynamic doping effect is achieved because more Cu ions enter into the PbSe lattice and provide extra charge carriers as the temperature increases, which guarantees an optimized carrier concentration over a wide temperature range. For the thermal transport, the presence of Cu2Se nanoprecipitates and dislocations at a low temperature range as well as the vibration of Cu atoms around the interstitial sites of PbSe at high temperatures result in hierarchical phonon scattering and a significantly reduced lattice thermal conductivity over the whole temperature range. As a result, a peak thermoelectric material figure of merit zT of up to 1.45 and a thermoelectric device figure of merit ZT close to unity are obtained for the sample with 0.375 at% Cu. Furthermore, enhanced thermoelectric properties are also realized for the Cu-intercalated PbS, implying that the temperature-driven dynamic behavior of Cu ions in a rigid lattice can serve as a general strategy to optimize the thermoelectric performance of IV-VI compounds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据