4.7 Article

Fuel consumption and engine-out emissions estimations of a light-duty engine running in dual-mode RCCl/CDC with different fuels and driving cycles

期刊

ENERGY
卷 157, 期 -, 页码 19-30

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.144

关键词

Reactivity controlled compression ignition; Dual-mode concept; Dual-fuel combustion; Efficiency; Driving cycles

资金

  1. FEDER
  2. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad through HiReCo project [TRA2014-58870-R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work compares the performance and emissions of two dual-mode combustion concepts over different driving cycles by means of vehicle systems simulations. The dual-mode concept relies on switching between the dual-fuel concept known as reactivity controlled compression ignition (RCCI) and conventional diesel combustion (CDC) to cover the whole engine map. The experimental RCCI maps obtained with diesel-E85 and diesel-gasoline used as inputs to perform the simulations were obtained in a high compression ratio light-duty diesel engine (17.1:1) following the same mapping procedure in both cases. The driving cycles simulated to perform the comparison were the Real Driving Emissions cycle (Europe), Worldwide harmonized Light vehicles Test Cycle (Europe), Federal Test Procedure FTP-75 (United States) and JC08 (Japan). The results show that the dual-mode concept has potential to be implemented in flexible-fuel vehicles. Using gasoline as low reactivity fuel (LRF) for RCCI, the vehicle mileage would be equal to CDC, but having reductions in NOx and soot emissions of 16% and 50%, respectively, along the RDE cycle. Using E85 instead of gasoline, the reductions in NOx and soot emissions increase up to 50% and 85%, respectively, but in this case promoting higher thermal efficiency than CDC. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据