4.7 Article

Performance enhancement of two-stage condensation combined cycle for LNG cold energy recovery using zeotropic mixtures

期刊

ENERGY
卷 157, 期 -, 页码 588-598

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.187

关键词

Two-stage condensation combined cycle; LNG cold energy; Zeotropic mixtures

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51606025]
  2. MOST innovation team in key area [2016RA4053]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT17RC (4)29]
  4. Liaoning Province S T Department [201601034]
  5. [LT2015007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The isothermal phase transition process of pure working fluids cannot effectively match the liquefied natural gas (LNG) gasification process, resulting in low efficiency of LNG cold energy power generation systems. In order to improve the temperature matching characteristics, mixed working fluids with a temperature glide during the phase change process can be adopted. In our previous study, the two-stage condensing process also effectively improved the temperature matching characteristics; thus, this paper presents a two-stage condensation combined cycle using zeotropic mixtures, and the effects of the type and number of components for mixed refrigerants on the two-stage condensing combined cycle system performance are studied. With the net power output as the objective function, the evaporation temperature, condensing temperatures, LNG expander inlet temperature, and working fluid mole fractions are optimised by the genetic algorithm. The results demonstrate that the net power output of n-05H(12) is the largest among the studied pure fluids. The net power output of the binary mixed working fluid at the optimum mole fractions is obviously superior to that of pure working fluids. The system performance is improved when the hydrocarbon mixture is selected as a working fluid, and the optimum number of components is three. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据