4.7 Article

Promoting acceptance of direct load control programs in the United States: Financial incentive versus control option

期刊

ENERGY
卷 147, 期 -, 页码 1278-1287

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.028

关键词

Power system; Direct load control; Demand response; Financial incentive; Control; Socio-demographics

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CNS 1541117]
  2. Engineering Research Center Program of the NSF
  3. Department of Energy under NSF [EEC-1041877]
  4. CURENT Industry Partnership Program
  5. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  6. Division Of Computer and Network Systems [1541148, 1541117] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Residential direct load control (DLC) is an important type of demand response designed to reduce electricity consumption during peak hours through utility companies' control over the operation of certain household appliances. Despite many benefits of DLC, customers' concern for losing control has been hindering its adoption. This study aims to investigate U.S. residents' willingness to accept two popular A/C -related DLC programs in summertime with or without financial incentives or an override option, and to identify the socio-demographic characteristics associated with the decisions. Results of an online survey among 1482 U.S. residents indicate half of the participants are willing to accept DLC without any conditions; however, both an incentive of $30 and an override option boost acceptance rates, Importantly, the override option is more effective than the financial incentive. Residents who are younger, Democrats, non-Whites, have higher education levels, live in larger dwellings, and live with more people are more likely to adopt DLC than their counterparts. Residents who are older, Republicans, Whites, homeowners, and live in a house preferred an override option to financial incentives more often. The implications were discussed in terms of improving power system stability through better DLC program design and implementation. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据