4.7 Article

An experimental study on the detonation transmission behaviours in acetylene-oxygen-argon mixtures

期刊

ENERGY
卷 143, 期 -, 页码 554-561

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.019

关键词

Detonation; Acetylene-oxygen-argon mixtures; Detonation cell size; Deflagration-to-detonation transition; Re-initiation distance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11702143]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accidental explosions/detonations preventions and control are practical as well as scientific issues. Although numerous research have been carried out to examine the combustion characteristics in acetylene mixtures, very limited studies focused on detonation transmission behaviours in a finite expansion space, which is of vital importance for the explosion safety assessment. This paper reports the detonation transmission behaviours through a confined sudden expansion in stoichiometric acetylene-oxygen mixtures diluted with varying amount of argon. Detonation velocity measurement and soot film visualization were used to characterize the detonation behaviour. The experimental results indicate that the initial over-driven degree of re-initiated detonation decreases with the increase of argon dilution in the expanded tube. Two transmission modes with distinct detonation cellular structures are experimentally observed. For the large expansion ratio, localized explosions followed by fine-scale detonation structures are observed in the expanded tube. As the initial pressure approaches the limiting transmission pressure, the re-initiation distance remarkably increases. For the small expansion, the near-limit detonation waves are observed to transmit to the expanded tube successfully without detonation re-initiation. A dimensionless cell size Lambda is introduced to correlate with the re-initiation distance of transmitted detonation in acetylene-oxygen-argon mixtures, and a unified curve can be obtained. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据