4.7 Article

Experimental validation of a novel piezoelectric energy harvesting system employing wake galloping phenomenon for a broad wind spectrum

期刊

ENERGY
卷 153, 期 -, 页码 882-889

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.04.109

关键词

Piezoelectric sensor; Energy harvester; Wake galloping; Wind tunnel test

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [NRF-2013R1A1A2011351, NRF-2015R1A2A1A16074926]
  2. Korean Minister of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT)
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2015R1A2A1A16074926, 2013R1A1A2011351] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a novel piezoelectric energy harvesting system using the wake galloping phenomenon is explored for the broad wind spectrum. Wake galloping is an aerodynamic instability phenomenon which has promising potential in energy harvesting. The offered advantage by the proposed system is having a wider wind speed range for a reliable and sustainable energy source for a small wireless sensor node, in addition to being simple and easily applicable to civil structures. In the proposed system, the flow of wind runs parallel to the placed cylinders with upstream cylinder fixed at one end while the downstream one is placed over an unimorph cantilever beam with piezoelectric film attached to it. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed system, several tests were conducted against wind speeds approaching till 10 m/s with varying cylinder spacing. The results revealed an optimum spacing between two cylinders of 3D and the cut-in speed was estimated to be 4 m/s. The attained results were smartly analyzed to further explore the effect of cylinder spacing on the aerodynamic vibrations and the other associated parameters. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据