4.7 Article

Comprehensive evaluation for different modes of solar-aided coal-fired power generation system under common framework regarding both coal-savability and efficiency-promotability

期刊

ENERGY
卷 143, 期 -, 页码 151-167

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.10.085

关键词

Solar-aided coal-fired power generation; Coal-savability; Efficiency-promotability; Comprehensive evaluation; Solar share; Energy level

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51406205]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2015CB251505]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solar-aided coal-fired power generation system (SCPGS) is a promising medium-term solution to reduce CO2 and PM2.5 emissions from numerous coal-fired power plants in China, yet lacking of unified theoretical guidance. In the present work, firstly, various specific integration schemes are reasonably generalized and unified by theoretical modelling. Secondly, the superposition effect has been revealed that the overall coal-savability of SCPGS is determined by not only the direct benefit due to local integration of solar energy but also the global effect of the integration on the system components in a superposition way. Meanwhile, the promotion effect has been revealed that the promotability of SCPGS on solar thermal exergy is primarily dependent on the higher-temperature Rankine cycle but sensitive to the energy level coupling between the solar thermal energy and the working fluid. Thirdly, the comprehensive evaluation factor (f), which serves as the common evaluation index between different SCPGSs considering both the coal-savability and efficiency-promotability, is proposed. Finally, with the help of the comprehensive evaluation factor, examples of application are given as demonstration for the comprehensive evaluations between 12 individual cases of SCPGS within a common framework. The present work is expected to fundamentally guide the future research and application of SCPGS. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据