4.7 Article

Characteristics and optimization of supercritical CO2 recompression power cycle and the influence of pinch point temperature difference of recuperators

期刊

ENERGY
卷 147, 期 -, 页码 1216-1226

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.161

关键词

Supercritical CO2 recompression cycle; Split ratio; Recuperator; Heat exchanger analysis; Effectiveness; Pinch point temperature difference

资金

  1. Brain Korea 21 Plus Project of the Ministry of Education
  2. Institute of Advanced Machinery and Design of Seoul National University
  3. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2013R1A2A1A01014589]
  4. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) [20168510011420, 20161120200090]
  5. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) from Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy [10063187]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Supercritical carbon dioxide (S-CO2) power cycle has been under the spotlight for years as one of the promising solutions to resolve the energy and environmental problem. The most of previous studies focused on cycle performances and applicable configuration. In this study, detailed and extensive analysis on the recompression S-CO2 power cycle was carried out to reflect more practical and desirable conditions. This study focused on the optimization of the S-CO2 cycle by evaluation of the irreversibility of the recuperators using the effectiveness analysis and pinch point temperature difference (PPTD) analysis. Split ratio from the main stream to the recompressor and compression ratio were considered as independent parameters. From the simulation, the characteristics and performance of the recompression cycle were discussed. The optimum operating conditions were determined in combinations of PPTDs of the two recuperators. With the performance curves, control strategy of the two independent parameters is ranged for desirable operation of S-CO2 power cycle. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据