4.4 Article

Us and Them: Black-White Relations in the Wake of Hispanic Population Growth

期刊

AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW
卷 80, 期 4, 页码 789-813

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0003122415587313

关键词

race; ethnicity; intergroup relations; Hispanics/Latinos; im/migration; identification

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [275-6091]
  2. Mellon Mays Program of the Social Science Research Council
  3. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences
  4. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1333561] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

How will Hispanic population growth affect black-white relations in the United States? Research on intergroup relations operates within a two-group paradigm, furnishing few insights into multi-group contexts. This study is based on an original experiment that combines behavioral game and survey methods to evaluate the impact of perceived Hispanic growth on attitudes and behavior. Results reveal opposite reactions among blacks and whites. Whites in the baseline condition contribute comparable amounts to black and white recipients in a dictator game, whereas whites who first read about Hispanic growth contribute more to white recipients than to black ones. By contrast, blacks in the baseline condition contribute more to black recipients than to white ones, whereas blacks who first read about Hispanic growth contribute comparable amounts to black and white recipients. Patterns of identification mirror patterns of contributions: whites exposed to Hispanic growth identify relatively more strongly with their racial group than with their national group, whereas blacks exposed to Hispanic growth identify relatively more strongly with their national group than with their racial group. Together, these results suggest that people respond to the growth of a third group by prioritizing the most privileged identity to which they can plausibly lay claim and which also excludes the growing group.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据