4.5 Review

Multiple-embryo transfer for studying very early maternal-embryo interactions in cattle

期刊

REPRODUCTION
卷 150, 期 2, 页码 R35-R43

出版社

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/REP-14-0465

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN) [AGL2012-37772]
  2. Principado de Asturias, Plan de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacion [GRUPIN 14-114]
  3. FEDER
  4. European Union Seventh Framework Programme [311776]
  5. Ministry of Science and Innovation [MICINN-RYC08-03454]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present paper, we highlight the need to study very early maternal-embryo interactions and discuss how these interactions can be addressed. Bovine species normally carry one or, less frequently, two embryos to term; there are very rare cases of triplets or higher-order multiple pregnancies in which all the offspring are born alive. Multiple-embryo transfer (MET) in cattle allows for the detection of endometrial responses in scenarios where single-embryo transfer would not. Although MET is non-physiological, the present study shows that at the very early embryonic stages, a uterus carrying zona-enclosed embryos does not exhibit non-physiological reactions. On the contrary, MET should be considered the sum of multiple individual effects triggered by developing embryos. We provide arguments to support our hypothesis that describe a rationale for current work with MET, and we discuss alternative hypotheses. Using cattle as a model, we describe how technical approaches to analyzing zona-enclosed early embryo-maternal interactions (i.e., transcriptomics, proteomics, and endometrial cell culture) can help identify molecular changes that may be difficult to observe when only a single embryo is present. We conclude that MET can be used for studying very early maternal-embryo interactions in vivo in monotocous species. Free Spanish abstract: A Spanish translation of this abstract is freely available at http://www.reproduction-online.org/content/150/2/R35/suppl/DC1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据