4.7 Article

ALMA OBSERVATIONS OF THE LARGEST PROTO-PLANETARY DISK IN THE ORION NEBULA, 114-426: A CO SILHOUETTE

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 808, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/808/1/69

关键词

circumstellar matter; protoplanetary disks; stars: pre-main sequence

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [AST-1009847]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Discovery Grant
  3. Associated Universities, Inc.
  4. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1208911, 1311910, 1313188] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present ALMA observations of the largest protoplanetary disk in the Orion Nebula, 114-426. Detectable 345 GHz (856 mu m) dust continuum is produced only in the 350 AU central region of the similar to 1000 AU diameter silhouette seen against the bright Ha background in Hubble Space Telescope images. Assuming optically thin dust emission at 345 GHz, a gas-to-dust ratio of 100, and a grain temperature of 20 K, the disk gas-mass is estimated to be 3.1 +/- 0.6 Jupiter masses. If most solids and ices have been incorporated into large grains, however, this value is a lower limit. The disk is not detected in dense-gas tracers such as HCO+ J = 4-3, HCN J = 4-3, or CS = 7-6. These results may indicate that the 114-426 disk is evolved and depleted in some light organic compounds found in molecular clouds. The CO J = 3-2 line is seen in absorption against the bright 50-80 K background of the Orion A molecular cloud over the full spatial extent and a little beyond the dust continuum emission. The CO absorption reaches a depth of 27 K below the background CO emission at V-LSR approximate to 6.7 km s(-1) similar to 0 ''.52 (210 AU) northeast and 12 K below the background CO emission at V-LSR approximate to 9.7 km s(-1) similar to 0 ''.34 (140 AU) southwest of the suspected location of the central star, implying that the embedded star has a mass less than 1 M-circle dot.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据