4.5 Article

Graphene particles supported on silica as sorbent for residue analysis of tetracyclines in milk employing microextraction by packed sorbent

期刊

ELECTROPHORESIS
卷 39, 期 15, 页码 2047-2055

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/elps.201800051

关键词

Graphene; Microextraction by packed sorbent; Tandem mass spectrometry; Tetracyclines

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2015/15462-5, 2014/07347-9]
  2. National Council of Science and Technology (CNPq) [307293/2014-9]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper describes the use of graphene-based sorbents for determination of four tetracyclines in milk. The synthesized materials were combined with microextraction by packed sorbent (MEPS) to act as the sample preparation step. The extraction performance of these sorbents was compared to commercial phases, and graphene supported on silica provided the best results. The analytical method optimization was carried out by employing experimental design. Firstly, an evaluation of the experimental variables (elution solvent, use of EDTA, ionic force, and pH of the washing solution) was made by a 2(4-1) factorial experimental design. The variables sampling, washing and elution cycles of MEPS were further optimized under a full 2(3) experimental design. The validation parameters were determined under optimized conditions resulting in a linearity ranging from 15 to 110g/L with R-2 values above 0.98, and LOQs ranging from 0.05 to 0.9g/L. The accuracy ranged from 87.9 to 118.4% and intra/inter-day precision reported by the RSDs were lower than 19%. The proposed and validated method was successfully applied to the analysis of 11 milk samples from different animals, revealing traces of tetracyclines in only two of them. This study focused on the evaluation of graphene-based sorbents combined with MEPS for tetracycline analysis provided equivalent or even better results than other proposed methods, suggesting being a sensitive, fast and reliable alternative method for the determination of tetracyclines in milk samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据