4.6 Article

Cobalt incorporated MoS2 hollow structure with rich out-of-plane edges for efficient hydrogen production

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 276, 期 -, 页码 81-91

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.04.163

关键词

Prussian blue analogue; Ammonium thiomolybdate; MoS2-Co nanoboxes; Raman spectroscopy; Hydrogen evolution reaction

资金

  1. Municipal Science Foundation of Chongqing City [CSTC-2015jcyjB50001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21675131]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, metal organic frameworks (MOFs) have received intensive research interest as an important family of functional materials. In particular, MOFs were widely used in electroanalysis and water splitting for their electrical conductivity and rich redox electrochemical activities. Prussian blue analogue (PBA), which owns hollow nanostructured MOFs with large surface area and unique structural features, offers great advantages for constructing advanced electrodes. Meanwhile, compared with platinum-based catalysts, molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) is increasingly becoming a research focus as an affordable alternative obtaining electrochemical hydrogen production from water. Here we synthesized the nano materials, MoS2-Co nanoboxes, using the facile hydrothermal method between cobalt Prussian blue analogue (Co PBA) nanocubes and ammonium thiomolybdate ((NH4)(2)MoS4). In acid and alkaline media, the MoS2-Co nanoboxes exhibit favorable catalytic performance for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). Furthermore, for researching the relationship of structural changes of MoS2 supported on Co PBA nanocubes and HER catalytic performance, we use the Raman spectroscopy to monitor nanostructured MoS2 which can promote the exposure of the most active sites. This new method applied in this study can be widely adopted for characterization of transition metal dichalcogenides with various compositions for a wide range of applications. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据