4.7 Article

Preparation of new polysulfone capsules containing Cyanex 272 and their properties for Co(II) removal from aqueous solution

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2015.06.007

关键词

Sorption; Polysulfone capsule; Cobalt removal; Cyanex 272

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, new polysulfone capsules containing Cyanex 272 (Cyanex 272@PSF capsules) were prepared by phase inversion technique for the sorption of Co(II) from aqueous solution. The characterization of the Cyanex 272@PSF capsules which were performed by using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) indicated that Cyanex 272 was successfully encapsulated by polysulfone. For the Cyanex 272@PSF capsules having the highest sorption efficiency, the encapsulation efficiency was determined as 7.2%. The batch sorption experiments showed that removal of Co(II) from aqueous solutions occurred through the cation-exchange and chelation mechanisms and maximum removal was achieved at an initial pH of 8.0 (final pH of 5.9). The Cyanex 272@PSF capsules produced with dispersed phase containing 2.0% of Cyanex 272 (by wt.) provided the highest Co(II) removal. The sorption equilibrium time was attained within 120 min. By confirming the non-linear Chi-square (x(2)) statistical test, Langmuir isotherm model was the best fit model. Langmuir sorption capacity (Q(o)) and sorption constant (b) were 2.014 mg/g and 0.281 L/mg, respectively. The regenerated capsules could be used three times with no change in their sorption capacities. Based on the experiments performed at initial pH of 8.0 for other metal ions, including Ni(II), Pb(II) and Cd(II), sorption ability of Cyanex 272@PSF capsules was in the order: Co(II) approximate to Ni(II)>Cd(II)>Pb( II). Consequently, Cyanex 272@PSF capsules have potential for removing Co(II) from aqueous solutions. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据