4.6 Article

Investigation of iron hexacyanoferrate as a high rate cathode for aqueous batteries: Sodium-ion batteries and lithium-ion batteries

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 270, 期 -, 页码 96-103

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.02.171

关键词

Iron hexacyanoferrate; High-rate electrode; Aqueous batteries; Sodium ion batteries; Lithium ion batteries

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1401243, 51232005]
  2. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2014CB932400]
  3. Shenzhen Technical Plan Project [JCYJ 20150529164918735, KQJSCX20160226191136, JCYJ20170412170911187]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, highly crystalline FeFe(CN)(6) with metal-organic framework is synthesized and measured in NaNO3 and LiNO3. Electrochemical kinetics, physical and chemical changes about the insertion and extraction processes of sodium ions and lithium ions in FeFe(CN)(6) are compared and discussed. Intriguingly, it exhibits a good electrochemical performance in sodium aqueous batteries, with a capacity of 118 mAh g(-1) at 400 mA g(-1), but a poor electrochemical behavior in lithium aqueous batteries. This study sheds light on the different insertion processes between sodium ions and lithium ions in FeFe(CN)(6), that the outer petaloid-like structure forms on the surface of FeFe(CN)(6) after Li ions insertion with little volume expansion, while FeFe(CN)(6) after Na ions insertion could still maintain the cubic-like structure with lattice change. Different insertion mechanisms of sodium ions and lithium ions are proposed that hydrated Na ions could insert at interstitial sites, while hydrated Li ions are more likely to occupy large open sites due to the larger radius of hydrated Li ions than hydrated Na ions. Besides, insertion/extraction performance and capacitive preformance dominate in NaNO3 and LiNO3, respectively. These differences may lead to the different electrochemical behaviors between sodium-ion and lithium-ion aqueous batteries. (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据