4.6 Article

Cr-doped Fe2F5 center dot H2O with open framework structure as a high performance cathode material of sodium-ion batteries

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 269, 期 -, 页码 479-489

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.02.159

关键词

Sodium-ion batteries; Cathode material; Iron-based fluoride; Cr-doping; Electrochemical performance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51272221]
  2. Key Project of Strategic New Industry of Hunan Province [2016GK4005, 2016GK4030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sphere-like Fe(2-x)CrxF5 center dot H2O (x = 0, 0.03, 0.05, 0.07) composites with open framework structure are prepared via an IL based assisted approach, and served as the cathode material for Na-ion batteries (NIBs). The physicochemical and electrochemical properties of the Cr-doped Fe2F5 center dot H2O cathode materials are systematically characterized. The results indicate that the Cr-doped materials not only reduce the crystalline size, but also remarkably enhance electronic conductivity. Meanwhile, the electrochemical tests further show that Fe1.95Cr0.05F5 center dot H2O as the cathode active material of NIBs exhibits a high initial discharge capacity of 357 mAh g(-1) and retains a discharge capacity of 171 mAh g(-1) after 100 cycles at 0.1 C (1 C = 200 mAh g(-1)). Moreover, even at high rate of 1 C, it can still deliver a high discharge capacity of 147 mAh g(-1). Compared with the Fe2F5 center dot H2O, the Fe1.95Cr0.05F5 center dot H2O shows higher discharge capacity, excellent cycle stability and better rate capability, which can be attributed to the improvement of structure stability and electronic conductivity due to the appropriate amount (5%) of Cr3+ doping. Therefore, the preparation of Cr-doped Fe2F5 center dot H2O sample provides a unique perspective to enhance the electrochemical performance of Fe2F5 center dot H2O, which is an essential step for the development of high specific energy sodium-ion batteries. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据