期刊
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 179-187出版社
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062
关键词
meta-aggregation; qualitative research synthesis; qualitative systematic review; synthesis methodology; theoretical perspective; transcendental phenomenology
Qualitative synthesis informs important aspects of evidence-based healthcare, particularly within the practical decision-making contexts that health professionals work in. Of the qualitative methodologies available for synthesis, meta-aggregation is most transparently aligned with accepted conventions for the conduct of high-quality systematic reviews. Meta-aggregation is philosophically grounded in pragmatism and transcendental phenomenology. The essential characteristics of a meta-aggregative review are that the reviewer avoids re-interpretation of included studies, but instead accurately and reliably presents the findings of the included studies as intended by the original authors. This study reports on the methodology and methods of meta-aggregation within the structure of an a priori protocol and standardized frameworks for reporting of results by over-viewing the essential components of a systematic review report.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据