4.5 Article

Bioconcentration and effects of hexabromocyclododecane exposure in crucian carp (Carassius auratus)

期刊

ECOTOXICOLOGY
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 313-324

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10646-018-1896-6

关键词

HBCD; Bioconcentration; Thyroid hormones; AChE; Behaviours

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51769034, 51509071]
  2. National Science Funds for Creative Research Groups of China [51421006]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a cycloaliphatic brominated flame retardant, hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) has been widely used in building thermal insulation and fireproof materials. However, there is little information on the bioconcentration as well as effects with respect to HBCD exposure in the aquatic environment. To investigate the bioconcentration of HBCD in tissues (muscle and liver) and its biochemical and behavioural effects, juvenile crucian carp (Carassius auratus) were exposed to different concentrations of technical HBCD (nominal concentrations, 2, 20, 200 mu g/L) for 7 days, using a flow-through exposure system. HBCD was found to concentrate in the liver and muscle with a terminal concentration of 0.60 +/- 0.22 mu g/g lw (lipid weight) and 0.18 +/- 0.02 mu g/g lw, respectively, at an environmentally-relevant concentration (2 mu g/L). The total thyroxine and total triiodothyronine in the fish plasma were lowered as a result of exposure to the HBCD. Acetylcholinesterase activity in the brain was increased, while swimming activity was inhibited and shoaling inclination was enhanced after exposure to 200 mu g/L HBCD. Feeding rate was suppressed in the 20 and 200 mu g/L treatment groups. In summary, HBCD concentrations 10-100x higher than the current environmentally-relevant exposures induced adverse effects in the fish species tested in this study. These results suggest that increasing environmental concentrations and/or species with higher sensitivity than carp might be adversely affected by HBCD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据