4.6 Article

THE XILING Sn DEPOSIT, EASTERN GUANGDONG PROVINCE, SOUTHEAST CHINA: A NEW GENETIC MODEL FROM 40Ar/39Ar MUSCOVITE AND U-Pb CASSITERITE AND ZIRCON GEOCHRONOLOGY

期刊

ECONOMIC GEOLOGY
卷 113, 期 2, 页码 511-530

出版社

SOC ECONOMIC GEOLOGISTS, INC
DOI: 10.5382/econgeo.2018.4560

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [41430314]
  2. Project of Outstanding Doctoral Dissertation of Beijing [519002650744]
  3. Project of Guangzhou Jiaye Investment Corporation [H02582]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Xiling Sn deposit is hosted in volcanic and subvolcanic rocks and belongs to the Southeastern Coastal metallogenic belt in China. Here we present zircon and cassiterite U-Pb and muscovite 40Ar/39Ar ages to constrain the timing of granitic magmatism and the genesis of the Sn mineralization. Laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry U-Pb dating of zircon grains from the tuff, tuffaceous lava, rhyolite porphyry, and granodiorite porphyry yielded weighted mean Pb-206/U-238 ages of 166.9 +/- 3.6, 164.8 +/- 3.0, 161.5 +/- 2.6, and 169.5 +/- 0.5 Ma, respectively. Zircon from the biotite granite adjacent to the southeastern part of the mine area yielded a U-Pb age of 145.8 +/- 0.6 Ma. Hydrothermal muscovite coexisting with cassiterite yielded a 40Ar/39Ar plateau age of 140.6 +/- 1.0 Ma, whereas cassiterite from two Sn ores yielded weighted mean Pb-206/U-238 ages of 146.4 +/- 1.0 and 147.5 +/- 1.1 Ma. The age data obtained in this study indicate that the volcanic-subvolcanic rocks in the mine area are genetically unrelated with the Xiling Sn mineralization and suggest hidden granitic intrusions at depth. In combination with the data from recent studies, we propose that the 145 to 135 Ma interval represents a newly recognized W-Sn metallogenic period linked with granitic intrusions in the southwestern part of the Southeastern Coastal metallogenic belt. The granitic intrusions formed during this period might therefore be potential candidates for W-Sn and Sn-Pb-Zn exploration in the region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据