4.5 Article

Unified representation of the C3, C4, and CAM photosynthetic pathways with the Photo3 model

期刊

ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
卷 384, 期 -, 页码 173-187

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.06.012

关键词

C3 photosynthesis; C4 photosynthesis; Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM); Plant water storage; Soil-plant-atmosphere continuum

类别

资金

  1. USDA Agricultural Research Service [58-6408-3-027]
  2. National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) [12110061]
  3. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CBET-1033467, EAR-1331846, FESD-1338694, EAR-1316258, GRFP-1106401]
  4. Duke WISeNet Grant [DGE-1068871]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent interest in crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) photosynthesis has resulted in new, physiologically based CAM models. These models show proinise, yet typically are not developed with a basis that is compatible with widely used models of C3 and C4 photosynthesis. Indeed, most efforts to assess the potential of CAM still rely on empirically based environmental productivity indices, which makes uniform comparisons between CAM and non-CAM species difficult. In order to represent C3, C4, and CAM photosynthesis in a consistent, physiologically based manner, we introduce the Photo3 model. Photo3 unites a common photosynthetic and hydraulic core with components depicting the circadian rhythm of CAM photosynthesis and the carbon-concentrating mechanism of C4 photosynthesis. This work allows consistent comparisons of the three photosynthetic types for the first time. It also allows the representation of intermediate C3-CAM behavior through the adjustment of a single model parameter. Model simulations of Opuntia ficus-indica (CAM), Sorghum bicolor (C4), and Triticum aestivum (C3) capture the diurnal behavior of each species as well as the cumulative effects of long-term water limitation. These results show the model's potential for evaluating the tradeoffs between C3, C4, and CAM photosynthesis, and for better understanding CAM productivity, ecology, and climate feedbacks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据