4.5 Article

Dome-shaped transition between positive and negative interactions maintains higher persistence and biomass in more complex ecological networks

期刊

ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
卷 370, 期 -, 页码 14-21

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.01.003

关键词

Non-monotonic interaction; Complexity; Diversity-stability; Persistence; Biomass; Ecological network

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31500347, 31330013]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB11050300]
  3. Information Fund of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XHH13506-201]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Positive relationship between diversity and biomass was often observed by empirical experiments at the community level, but the effects of species interactions on community total biomass have been rarely explored from a network perspective. Weak interaction and specific non-monotonic interactions have been proposed to be stabilizing mechanisms in maintaining persistence in more complex ecosystems, but it is unclear how they contribute to the high level of biomass or productivity of these systems. In this study, we examined the effects of various interactions, specifically dome-shaped (shifting from positive to negative effect with increase of density) and satiated interactions, on biomass and biomass flow with the increase of complexity in theoretical networks. Our results indicated that, as compared to linear or satiated interactions, dome-shaped interactions maintained both higher persistence and biomass or biomass flow in more complex networks, but resulted in larger variations of species biomass. However, variation of network biomass was much smaller than that of species biomass. Our results suggest that species interaction shifting between mutualism at low density and competition or predation at high density could be a driving force for maintaining high levels of persistence, diversity, biomass and biomass flow in natural ecosystems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据