4.7 Article

Global warming, grain production and its efficiency: Case study of major grain production region

期刊

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
卷 105, 期 -, 页码 563-570

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.022

关键词

Global warming; Land surface temperature; Grain production; Grain production efficiency; Input distance function

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0602500]
  2. Project of the Science and Technology Service (STS) Network Initiative, Chinese Academy of Sciences [KFJ-EW-STS-058]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Historical records and multiple researches have indicated that there is a close connection between carbon dioxide and surface temperature. Climate change and its impacts on agriculture, especially grain production, is one of the major challenges for food security and sustainable development. From the perspective of natural flow, climate change directly affects plant growth via water circulation, such as droughts and floods. Although the covariation of surface temperature and CO2 concentration will to some extent benefit crop photosynthesis, grain production may fluctuate according to the grain market, which is also affected by its erratic provisioning. We then determine how climate change affects grain production and efficiency using an input distance function and technical inefficiency model. First, we discover a significant relationship between surface temperature and grain production, although this impact is marginal; the coefficient is 0.0037 in the estimated model. Second, we find that surface temperature influences grain production not only through its photosynthesis but also its production efficiency in major grain production areas. And grain production efficiency is in a decreasing trend from 2000 to 2010, the average efficiency in 2010 is 0.75 on the whole. Third, there is a large gap in grain production efficiency among counties in Inner Mongolia, Hebei, Heilongjiang and Henan provinces, according to a distribution map of that efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据